As a coalition of students from African American Studies, Gender & Women’s Studies and Ethnic Studies we are responding to the Operational Excellence Organizational Simplification Committee’s recent decision, under the direction of the Dean of Social Sciences, to employ a strategy of attrition to our departments by reducing the number of staff positions. Although these decisions do not explicitly target and impair our departments, we believe a cut of this magnitude will inevitably do just that. The claim that our departments can sustain a functional infrastructure without these people (their expertise, labor) is problematic. The implications of reduced FTEs are extensive; some of the most obvious of these include the decline of the quality of our curriculum, the strength of our departmental identities, and the ultimate possibility of dissolving our departments completely.
This coalition represents a collective student voice formed as a direct result of the clustering effects of the demands listed in the Organizational Simplification of the Social Science and the Reorganization of Units. We believe that the cuts made to our departments communicates a symbolic message to the larger UC Berkeley community that spaces on our campus concerned with transdisciplinary knowledge production occupy a tertiary position in the University's commitment to equity and inclusion. These spaces are important because they provide a space to develop language and critical praxis for women, LGBTQIA identified individuals, students of color and other marginalized communities on our campus. This is of particular relevance given the growing hostility towards similar program across the nation.
Furthermore, students, faculty and staff in these 3 departments embody a strong commitment to community service and recruitment and retention of underrepresented students. The campus diversity that is a result of this work is the hallmark of the University of California at Berkeley. However, this labor is currently invisible under the purview of Organizational Simplification. As a result, another unforeseen consequence of these cuts would be the decline in underrepresented populations on campus as these cuts undermine our ability to continue to serve as leaders in these efforts.
During the most recent Alliance meeting with Dean Carla Hesse of the Social Sciences, we were given a chart that provided the “data” on which the decision to cut staff positions was based. In regards to each department, the metrics were inaccurate and misleading. We have found numerous errors in the data sources that have been provided for us thus far. The decision to cut these positions, a decision based on irresponsible calculations, elucidates the Organizational Simplification Committee’s inability to adhere to its own basic principles. Please note that we are not writing this letter to demand special treatment. Instead we are calling for structural change in the design of Organizational Simplification program specifically, and the Operational Excellence at large.
In order to achieve operational excellence, we demand the following:
Demands from the Department of African American Studies
I. Of the 70 new faculty hires allocated next year, we demand that four of those new hires be designated to the Department of African American Studies.
II. Due to the consolidation of certain aspects of building operations we demand that our Informational Technology (IT) staff member be appointed to the projected Barrows IT Team. We also demand that our IT staff member be reinstated to 100% full-time position.
III. In light of the drastic cuts to all staff in the Department of African American Studies, our Office Manager is now responsible for African American Studies, Gender & Women’s Studies, and Ethnic Studies. We demand that appointments be restored to 100% FTE.
IV. In order to decrease the overall workload and stress on individual staff members, we demand that there be additional funding allocated for work-study positions in the Department of African American Studies. This will include the hiring and training of both undergraduate and graduate students (preferably students from the Departments of African American Studies/Ethnic Studies/Gender & Women’s Studies referred by the Multicultural Student Development).
Demands from the Department of Gender & Women’s Studies
I. We demand that the metrics deployed in the Fact Sheet Concerning the Organizational Simplification of the Social Science Division and the Reorganization of Units be recalculated based on the following data: Gender & Women’s Studies currently has 71 (not 42) enrolled Majors, 130 Designated Emphasis students and 30 Minors (left unmentioned).
II. We reject the decision to reduce our one and only Student Affairs Officer (SAO), Althea Grannum-Cummings' position by 50% as of July, 1 2011. We demand that Ms. Grannum-Cummings' position be restored to 100% full-time again.
III. We demand that the University commit to preserving a 100% Student Affairs Officer position both in the present moment and future of the Gender and Women's Studies Department.
Demands from the Department of Ethnic Studies
I. We demand that the metrics deployed in the Fact Sheet Concerning the Organizational Simplification of the Social Science Division and the Reorganization of Units be updated and recalculated. Upon close inspection of the statistics we have been provided, we have found numerous out-of-date or inaccurate calculations with regards to these cuts. For example, the current ratios presented do no account for the additional 2.0 staff FTEs that are yet to be replaced since 2009. This would bring the actual total layoffs to 4.5 (as opposed to 2.5) FTE positions in Ethnic Studies alone. Minors and Lecturers are also unaccounted for in the current ratios used to calculate staff workload.
II. We demand a reinstatement of these 4.5 FTE positions.
III. We demand that the department of Ethnic Studies, with its 4 programs in Asian American Studies, Native American Studies, Chican@ Studies, and Comparative Ethnic Studies, be recognized as a department with a target faculty of 24 FTE, with 6 FTE for each individual major program. The current metric used for calculations is 18, which does not honor the omega figure provided by an Ethnic Studies external review, where it is made clear that 24 faculty members are needed for Ethnic Studies to serve as a functional department in the division of Social Sciences.
Collective demands from the Departments of African American Studies, Gender & Women’s Studies and Ethnic Studies
I. Furthermore, in order to ensure transparency and an effective student voice in the OE process, we demand departmental student representation and decision making power on the OE committee(s) that specifically affects the social sciences. Students will have a democratic process of electing those representatives.
II. As a coalition the students of each department are in full support of each demand stated in this letter. We reject the cuts made at present. We demand the reinstatement of all our staff members, the 100% full-time positions for our staff members and the University’s commitment to preserving 100% staff positions both in the present moment and in the future.
We expect a response by March 28, 2011.
Signed,
The Coalition for Gender and Women’s Studies, African American Studies and Ethnic Studies


